Part Seven: Body Find and Continued Investigation
So the police continued to investigate Ambrose as a "missing person" doing their histology on him like they do with most people and built up that negative picture of the man to prevent their shady shit being exposed.
With no new leads and no real solid answers to what happened to Ambrose as most of it had been speculation as accounts were contradicting each other, then there was what had been viewed on CCTV showing certain events at the Fox Pub with again contradicted those accounts.
So it had been nearly three months and a new lead comes in a body is found in the River Lea by a Inspector checking the waters.
The Body Find
So on the 22nd April 2015 a body is found and the police straight away say it's Ambrose without any identification from any family member.
The statement of the inspector who first found the body is below.
So he says he was working on the "Lower Maynard Reservoir" which is next to Lockwood Reservoir opposite where the body was found in the River Lea which it stated by the coroner (which we can't find but there is proof of this).
So the worker was "Walking North" which means he passed Ferry Lane Water Beds entrance and came round passed Lockwood Reservoir walking on the "West Side"
At 13:45 pm he is walks alongside the reservoir when he spots something in the water and believes it to be an "animal" at first sight until he goes closer can "smell decay" then it became clear it was a "body" sitting West of the reservoir.
So for the worker to be "Walking North" he is either heading up towards Stonebridge Lock or cuts across and went towards the river opposite the industrial estate up by Ferry Lane.
He also states he waits by a gate to wait for the police after he phones them now there are to gates this could be the one by the Filter Beds or the gate that prevents you gaining access to where the boats are moored which one we do not know as it has never been fully stated as he if the worker is walking on the "west side" after working on "Lower Maynard Reservoir" he's on the opposite side to where the gate is, he would have to cross the water to be physically standing by that gate so the only other gate he could be physically standing by is the one that leads into the Beds there which actually has a island there the body may have been found on.
Pic A is both of the Reservoirs side by side.
Pic B and point 1 that's the gate that prevents you gaining access to the moored boats.
Point 2 is where it's believed the body was found and is close to a gate.
Point 3 is just another part of the river that has what could be deemed an island with a tree.
Point 4 is where there is what looks like an island or blockage of some sort and where the Lea splits into two channels.
Point 5 is Ferry Lane Filter Beds Entrance.
If the workers finished up what made them go up back that way there's know way out they would have come back passed both reservoirs and out through point 5 making point 4 the closes point with what looks like an island or blockage, to walk to point 2 where it's believed the body was found logically makes no sense unless they were "sent" there, they were checking the waters which they weren't checking they the "Lower Maynard Reservior".
The only other logical thing that took them that way was the "smell " of "decay" was that rank they naturally went to investigate finding the body otherwise it's a wasted journey because there's know way out.
The depth of water isn't very deep on a 6ft odd person the water is ankle/calf height you can walk through it with no issues standing at 5ft 8.
The only way your drowning in that water is if you are injured and collapse, your put in there and held face down as that wouldn't present a struggle only a struggle to breath or your dead before you enter.
So the police are called and the family are informed of a body find and speak with Shresh Grover of the monitoring group.
So the police are certain it's Ambrose due to the clothing it's wearing, so they inform the family anyway though they are not 100% positive who it is.
Police Continued Investigation
So the family are left over 24 hours before they know if it is or not Ambrose they are not even sure when they visit the morgue to view the body.
So the body hadn't even been "cleaned up" to view and was sitting in he same state they had brought it in like.
The body was found "wearing" a "jacket" but the police didn't seem to know what it was found in they though they had viewed "photos" of the "crime scene" and"body" they hadn't seemed to have viewed the same "photos" as they if and but around the question, so that made the families question that the "jacket" was "planted" and not "dropped" like suggested holding better stead as why would he leave a "mobile phone" in the car but then take and drop a "jacket" that was "cold" though it had been in the "rain" and "cold" weather it was only found "cold" not wet or damp just "cold" and then the body being found wearing one makes no logical sense other then it was "planted"
Someone serving a prison sentence is visited by the same police investigating the Ambrose case, they attend this prison and proceed to divulge some information regarding a body and what they may know regarding it the day before the body is actually found.
The way this came about was the copper was identified innocently by the person they visited within in a meeting held by the police but hey they denied this but their behaviour would show guilt.
The Post-mortem was conducted and the findings would come back inconclusive and can't be linked to Ambrose as they never had any DNA to compare any tissue to etc.
They didn't even take finger prints off the body because according to Stewart Hill "there's not a whole body" and "fingerprints couldn't be taken" so no DNA was actually conducted to prove if that was Ambrose or not.
The liver wasn't even tested due to the weight being incorrect they only used 49 grams when they needed 100 grams for a good reading and let's not forget the liver it's self only weighed 800 and something grams just under half the size of a human males average liver which is 1400 grams basically a pound, so only one diatom would be found in the lung but couldn't be matched to the river water the body was found in so they couldn't rule the body died in the water it was found in.
The face skin being the only skin to completely go off the body has never been discussed ever to why it was the only area to be effected where on medical fact the face skin is the last thing to go in water and the first thing to go on a land death.
This info here just explains about a fracture that happened years before but it still didn't explain the scar changing shape and why this may have happened.
The dislocation of the fingers is down to decaying of the body in the water but according to the police would be one of the only things to effected by "decomposition" apart from the face but viewing by the family the finger tips weren't decayed was only the face.
The "missing tattoo" was "visible" at the "scene" when the body was found but when the family viewed and had taken photos the "tattoo" wasn't there so how can that be possible if the "torso" was visible when the inspector finds it and "sees" the "tattoo" but on pictures its not there another thing that makes no logical sense (the tattoo isn't in the statement above he only talks about the "torso" you will hear that within the next video)
The CT Information had been changed twice bringing doubt on what happened, what car did he get into and who did he drive back with , DOB and crash location being wrong.
Here's the first one:
So this one say's "Ferry Lane" as the crash location, was a "passenger in a friends car" and was born on the "1st Jan 1983"
Here's the second one:
This one say's he left the "scene in his car" the car was "involved in an incident" and was "discovered abandoned by police" and he was born on the "2nd March 1984" which is correct birthdate but again they fuck up and put "pub in Tottenham" well the pub was not in "Tottenham" it was in "Palmers Green" they couldn't even get the locations right on the second one they presented after they totally changed the information and that is an redaction in evidence regardless of how you deem it they retracted information and then presented wrong factual information on final findings, It wasn't "discovered by police" it was found by a passer by who called it in, the "pub wasn't in Tottenham" and the family never once identified "Ambrose getting into his car"
These wouldn't be the only redactions in the evidence there would also be two version of events about what car people would travel in when they travelled to Southgate, Arnos Grove and finally where the crash happened.
Here's one version of events:
So in tis one it's clear that they leave in BMW Light Blue car" belonging to Ambrose "Jay"
"Jay even offered me an invite.............. BMW Light Blue car" then went to "Southgate" then onto "Arnos Grove"
Here is the second version of events:
In this one they went to "Southgate" in another persons "car" and then "got" in "Jays car".
There is a third statement where the car catches "fire" and they "run off together" then that also changes to he decamps and finds the "car smashed up" and "leans in" to get belongings.
The amount of changes to the information regarding what happened that morning and then the police information changes too much and many wonder why it can become confusing when you look at the amount of contradictions in evidence there's redaction after redaction.
Same with the CCTV from the pub the coroner ordered at the pre inquest that the police hand over all evidence to which they held back and then allowed CCTV to be viewed that had never been seen before where Ambrose is seen being attack more then once, CCTV changes from bare streets to streets full of people, clothes change colour as Ambrose is said to be wearing a "White T-Shirt when on camera it's Navy, jackets being worn and held all at the same time, time lapses where seconds of footage disappears, bodies being carried, trainers changing colour, phones being used and police presence the list goes on and on.
The next post is all about the inquest there we will talk more on the police as it was at the inquest where the police continued to cover up the death of His Name Is Ambrose on the 24th Jan 2015.
But here's one of the break downs done on one the CCTV viewings.
