Part Eight: Inquest, BBC and IPCC
So the pre inquest is concluded and Ambrose didn't die from "Natural Causes" and the coroner demands that all evidence is handed over.
During this same time a second post-mortem is conducted and finds the same findings as the first one but the family wanted an independent witness which the police failed to allow deeming the second one illegal.
The police mess about and finally allow the family to view CCTV which becomes different to what they watch at the first CCTV viewing it changes as they view more and more footage.
They view Ambrose being attacked at least three times.
They see what looks like an attack with a tool which is taken from behind the back of the aggressor and brought down onto Ambrose's body which then shows impact.
They see what they believe to be a body being carried there is a police officer standing beside the alleyway and the person carrying the body was large in frame and looked like they were wearing a "puffa jacket"
The police are seen at the top of the frame where Ambrose's run towards with his top torso exposed only to be capture seconds laters fully clothed with know footage presented or is it in any witness statement how Ambrose came to be full clothed after having his top torso exposed.
Their investigation closed in the around the July with no suspects or any real answers into what happened to Ambrose that morning.
The police would drag up old wounds of his mother bringing her "child abuse" ordeal into it aswell as her mental health.
BBC Documentary
So the BBC had been following the family for a documentary "This is Tottenham" where MP David Lammy spoke with people like a surgery type thing and Ambrose's two aunties would attend the firsts meeting as Ambrose's mum was in hospital and was unable to attend.
So they were following the family through a hard point which clearly shows on the programme but don't think it shows them in a "bad way" what it does show is a family without any answers regarding a missing family member.
It does show the police in a good way which is untrue what it doesn't show is how they didn't support the family like its stated they had let the family down in more ways then one regarding their botched investigation and how they communicated or lack of communication throughout.
It didn't show all of the corruption the covering up of cctv, changing of witness statements, ct info being changed then changed again, the media wrong doings like info which was given to them by the police, the lack of appeals, lack of searches the list goes on and on we could be here all day on how the police were made to look on this programme when in truth they didn't do nothing that helped or supported this family all they did was hinder any real investigation taking place as the one they conducted you can't call investigating when they were investigating a "missing person" when they knew he had been "murdered" as he had died in their custody.
It also shows the identification of the body where his mum says "that's my son" though you don't see it you hear it but what they didn't show the public was the questions that came with the ID after the initial words "that's my son" they didn't show them questioning the tattoo, scar and face and why these things were gone or misshaped none of that was shown throughout the programme.
They didn't show the public the question surrounding the body, his mother kept saying about there being a "whole body" as Stuart Hill had said "there not a whole body" when he was at the morgue and this was told to his family before viewing only to view an arm that looked "intact" and a whole body lying there covered in a sheet, they had taken pictures also and viewed them and even more questions arose from those hence there not being aswell as no DNA there has never been a correct identification on the body.
The BBC aired a programme where parts of it were untrue and bias.
The Inquest
So the inquest is called in Jan 2016 at barnets coroners court led by Coroner Andrew Walker.
The inquest went ahead even though the the body hadn't had any DNA on it, the tissues didn't match and the diatom couldn't explain which part of the river the body had died but the inquest went forward with the body in the morgue being Ambrose even though the tattoo, face and scar had never been answered by any medical practitioner.
They use the final imagine from the Fox as Ambrose leaving stating it was him then even though it was questioned, they couldn't present any imagines from Southgate was only the mobile phone at 1:58 am, the car is caught at 2:32:03 on some ANPR cam on the rounder-about before it's seen again at 2:32:41 they use the imagine of Ambrose from the shop on Bowes Road as the last known place he was leaving before the crash happened, the last imagine is him at 2:59:04 am (The last pic with the orange frame in the lot of Ambrose) it capture's him leaving turning right as he leaves the shop on the 24th Jan 2015.
The car then tis captured at 2:58 am on a cam outside the shop (don't ask us how it can be captured there when he leaves the shop at 2:59:04) it travels all the way down the A406 without being captured on the other two ANPR cams before being seen at 3:03:36 driving at speed onto Conduit Lane then crashing into the railings at Leeside at 3:06 am first losing its wheel and number plate it then captured at 3:07 am passing Glover Road on a camera that comes before the crash location (again don't ask us how that works but this is what the police handed over as final evidence which wasn't questioned by the coroner) the passenger than decamps from the car by the power-station, the car then hits something again making a "loud bang" which would of been the bollards by Sedge Road then the car is found near the alleyway at 3:09 am.
They then have him grabbing a coat from his car, leaving his mobile phone before running down the alleyway making footprints by the Brook, dropping the jacket up near the field running across that taking the left down over the Brook right down the long path out down by the lock, over the bridge and crossing over towards the reservoir (in our conclusion we will tell you how that is possible but how he never did that without being seen nor in the timeframe given)
Witnesses are called and they give their evidence with a few contradicting each other on times, who said and did what surrounding that morning even stating what police had said regarding a "crash" before "Leeside" but it wouldn't have been at the railings as there's a camera sitting there which captured the shot at 3:07 am (it would have happened before that but again that's for the conclusion)
The locations weren't really questioned and many police would state the body couldn't reach where the body was from where the jacket was found as the Pymmes Brook and River Lea don't meet until further down passed the bridge at Ferry Lane.
They do not know the location of entry into the water but Sharon Freeman-Woods would state that he crossed over to cross back again getting into trouble and ending up in the water and drowning" being found on the 22nd April 2015 in the River Lea.
The body was found around half a mile down river in an area not searched by police that sits behind the pallet yard by a water inspector who first thought it was an "animal" before moving closer and finding it was a human body who's "torso" was exposed showing a "tattoo" but not body view the "tattoo" was missing, the scar on the leg had changed shaped but both had never been answered to why this had occurred and the reason's behind it.
The body at the inquest was identified only through a photo of two tattoos compared of an arm side by side, one on a corpse and one on a body from a photo deeming that the final body identification without any DNA taken and compared as the tissues failed to much the body deemed to be Ambrose.
The face skin had completely gone off the face sited a "land death" not that of a water one and this this would tally in with only one diatom that couldn't be linked to the river even though he was meant have a taken his last breath in that water source it couldn't be linked to his death, the liver wasn't even tested like they said it was 600 and something grams the liver weighed that is abnormally small for a grown man but it went down as "submersion in cold water, consistent with drowning"
The would only handover the 20 minutes compilation which was shown to the court all other CCTV or attacks were left out, the original downloaded footage would be deemed corrupt and unusable same same as the footage of the first helicopter search from the 24th it's was deemed corrupt so there was no footage of a search that was meant to have taken place again only flight logs suggest it did take place though it was said he entered the water going unnoticed by their heat source.
The two documents that had different information regarding events from that night the first one would be dismissed as false and they used the second one the one with the correct DOB and the location being Watermead Way and not that Ferry Lane, which where the body was found would make logical sense being so close to that crash location more then that of Waternead Way!
So the coroner ruled "open verdict" ruling out a possible "accident" stating it wasn't clear how he entered the water and "foul play" couldn't be ruled out which was agreed upon by Police officer Stewart Hill though Sharon Freeman-Woods would disagree the coroner would rule against her and went with "open" over "accident" on those grounds aswell as the families views on it being "out of character for him to have not contacted them!
IPCC
So a complaint went into the IPCC in July 2015 regarding the missing persons report.
The complaint then changes to the treatment of his mother, how they ignored her pleas into the safety of her son, and their failed attendance through searches over that same 48 hours.
The complaint is nothing to do with anything leading up to the crash it's all about after.
The wrong officers are being given misconduct investigations when they haven't done jack wrong the call handler is one of them.
The IPCC investigation is still on going it's been two years and three months since the complaint went into them with minimal contact the last contact being this year when an email was sent asking what evidence was used, getting back an email stating that evidence belonged to the police and the evidence used would be documented in their final report.
Still waiting for that report to surface.
The last part to all of this is the conclusion where we can really talk about the cover up into Ambrose's death as though we have put our points along the way the conclusion we also talk about new stuff we have collected since we wrote certain parts.
